Questions relating to the interpretation or application of the law are called?

Questions relating to the interpretation or application of the law are called?

• A. Questions of law
• B. Substantive law
• C. Questions of fact
• D. Original jurisdiction

Answer: (A)

Questions relating to the interpretation or application of the law are called questions of law. This means the issue is about what a statute, constitution, contract, or regulation means and how it should be applied to the facts of the case. For example, deciding whether a statute prohibits a certain action is a question of law because it involves legal interpretation. By contrast, questions of fact ask about what actually happened—things like whether a contract was breached or whether a witness was credible—areas that the judge or jury determines based on the evidence presented. Substantive law deals with rights and duties themselves, not the act of interpreting them, and original jurisdiction concerns which court has the authority to hear a case first. When a case reaches an appellate court, questions of law are typically reviewed de novo, meaning the higher court reconsiders them anew, while questions of fact are given deference to the trial court’s findings.

Questions relating to the interpretation or application of the law are called questions of law. This means the issue is about what a statute, constitution, contract, or regulation means and how it should be applied to the facts of the case. For example, deciding whether a statute prohibits a certain action is a question of law because it involves legal interpretation. By contrast, questions of fact ask about what actually happened—things like whether a contract was breached or whether a witness was credible—areas that the judge or jury determines based on the evidence presented. Substantive law deals with rights and duties themselves, not the act of interpreting them, and original jurisdiction concerns which court has the authority to hear a case first. When a case reaches an appellate court, questions of law are typically reviewed de novo, meaning the higher court reconsiders them anew, while questions of fact are given deference to the trial court’s findings.